Breathing Easy: How Asbestos Air Testing Safeguards Public Health in the UK

Adam Fox • 30 June 2023

Asbestos fibres, when released into the air, can be inhaled and cause serious health issues

Introduction to asbestos air testing


Asbestos is a dangerous mineral that was widely used in construction materials until its ban in the UK in 1999. However, many buildings still contain asbestos, posing a significant risk to public health. Asbestos fibres, when released into the air, can be inhaled and cause serious health issues, including lung cancer and mesothelioma. That's why asbestos air testing plays a crucial role in safeguarding public health in the UK.


The importance of asbestos air testing for public health


Asbestos air testing is a vital process that helps identify the presence of asbestos fibres in the air and determines whether the levels are within safe limits. By conducting regular air testing, potential asbestos exposure can be identified and mitigated, reducing the risk of asbestos-related diseases. The primary goal of asbestos air testing is to protect the health and safety of individuals in their homes, workplaces, and public buildings.


Different types of asbestos air testing - Reassurance, Background, Clearance, Leakage, Personal


There are various types of asbestos air testing, each serving a specific purpose in assessing asbestos exposure.


  1. Reassurance Air Testing & Monitoring: This type of testing is conducted to provide reassurance that the levels of asbestos fibres in the air are below the control limit. It is often performed after the accidental disturbance of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM's) to ensure that the area is safe for occupation.
  2. Background Air Testing & Monitoring: Background testing is carried out in areas where asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) are known to be present but are not being disturbed. It helps establish the baseline levels of asbestos fibres in the air for comparison with future test results.
  3. Clearance Air Testing & Monitoring: Clearance testing is essential after asbestos removal or remediation works. It confirms that the area is free from asbestos fibres and safe for reoccupation. The clearance indicator of 0.01 f/ml is used as a benchmark to determine whether the area meets the required standards.
  4. Leakage Air Testing & Monitoring: Leakage testing is performed during asbestos removal or remediation to ensure that no asbestos fibres are escaping into surrounding areas. It helps ensure the prevention of the spread of asbestos contamination during the works.
  5. Personal Air Testing & Monitoring: Personal air testing involves monitoring the exposure of individuals who are at risk of asbestos exposure due to their job or specific circumstances. This type of testing ensures that workers are not being exposed to harmful levels of asbestos fibres beyond the protection factor of their Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE) and that the control measures being employed to reduce airborne fibre levels are working effectively.


Understanding the Control Limit of 0.1 f/ml and Clearance Indicator of 0.01 f/ml


In asbestos air testing, specific control limits and clearance indicators are used to assess the safety of an area. The Control Limit of 0.1 f/ml refers to the maximum acceptable concentration of asbestos fibres in the air. If the levels exceed this limit, immediate action is required to mitigate the risk. On the other hand, the Clearance Indicator of 0.01 f/ml is used during clearance testing to determine whether an area is safe for reoccupation. If the levels are below this indicator, the area is considered asbestos-free and can be safely used.


The process of asbestos air testing - sampling, analysis, and reporting


Asbestos air testing involves several steps, starting with sampling the air to collect airborne particles. These samples are then analysed using polarised light microscopy (PLM) techniques to identify and quantify asbestos fibres. The process includes fibre counting, where a trained analyst counts the number of fibres found in the sample. This information is then used to determine the concentration of asbestos fibres in the air.


Once the analysis is complete, a comprehensive report is generated, detailing the findings and the concentration levels. This report serves as a valuable tool for property owners, employers, and individuals to understand the risk of asbestos exposure and take appropriate measures to protect themselves and others.


The role of microscopy and fibre counting in asbestos air testing


Polarised Light Microscopy (PLM) plays a crucial role in asbestos air testing as it allows for the identification and quantification of asbestos fibres. Through microscopy, analysts can distinguish between asbestos and non-asbestos fibres, ensuring accurate results. Fibre counting, carried out by trained analysts, provides valuable information about the concentration of asbestos fibres in the air, helping determine whether the levels are within safe limits.


Understanding key terms - LQL, Control Limit, Clearance Indicator


To fully comprehend asbestos air testing, it is essential to understand key terms such as LQL (Lower Quantification Limit), Control Limit, and Clearance Indicator.


The LQL, refers to the lowest concentration of asbestos fibres that can be reliably detected and quantified in a sample. Where insufficient quantities of air have been sampled, the accuracy of the air test is significantly reduced meaning it isn't possible to guarantee fibre levels below this limit.


The Control Limit of 0.1 f/ml is the maximum acceptable concentration of asbestos fibres in the air, beyond which immediate action is required to reduce the risk of further exposure and to reduce the fibre levels in the area. This will usually involve investigation by a professional company such as Consulo Compliance followed by remediation works by a licensed asbestos removal contractor.


The Clearance Indicator of 0.01 f/ml is used during clearance testing to determine whether an area is safe for reoccupation. Fibre levels above this limit will require further investigation to identify the source of the fibre followed by further removal work and fine cleaning by the licensed contractor.


The role of the RICE Scheme in asbestos air testing


The RICE (Respiratory Inorganic Fibres Counting and Evaluation) Scheme is a vital component of asbestos air testing. It provides a standardized framework for the analysis and evaluation of asbestos fibres in air samples. Laboratories participating in the RICE Scheme undergo rigorous testing and quality control measures to ensure accurate and reliable results.


Benefits of regular asbestos air testing


Regular asbestos air testing offers numerous benefits in safeguarding public health. By conducting periodic testing, potential asbestos exposure can be identified early, allowing for timely remediation measures. This proactive approach helps reduce the risk of asbestos-related diseases and ensures the safety of individuals in their homes, workplaces, and public buildings. Regular testing also provides peace of mind, knowing that the air is free from harmful asbestos fibres.


Common misconceptions about asbestos air testing


Despite the importance of asbestos air testing, there are some common misconceptions that need to be addressed. One misconception is that asbestos air testing is unnecessary if asbestos-containing materials are intact. However, even undisturbed ACMs can release fibres into the air over time, posing a risk to occupants. Another misconception is that asbestos air testing is a complex and costly process. In reality, with advancements in technology and the availability of accredited laboratories, asbestos air testing has become more accessible and affordable than ever before.


Conclusion: The significance of asbestos air testing in safeguarding public health in the UK


Asbestos air testing plays a critical role in safeguarding public health in the UK. By identifying and quantifying asbestos fibres in the air, potential exposure can be mitigated, reducing the risk of asbestos-related diseases. The different types of asbestos air testing, including reassurance, background, clearance, leakage, and personal testing, each serve specific purposes in assessing asbestos exposure. Understanding key terms like LQL, Control Limit of 0.1 f/ml, and Clearance Indicator of 0.01 f/ml is essential for interpreting asbestos air testing results accurately. Regular testing and the role of the RICE Scheme further contribute to the effectiveness of asbestos air testing in protecting individuals and ensuring safe environments.


Contact Consulo Compliance today to check you're not being exposed to asbestos fibre in your home or workplace.


Contact Now
by Adam Fox 9 April 2025
Asbestos and the Circular Economy: Why It's Time to Stop Burying the Problem Twenty-five years after asbestos was banned in the UK, we’re still digging a hole—literally and metaphorically. Every day, across the country, asbestos waste is double-bagged, labelled, loaded into skips, and driven to landfill, where it will sit indefinitely, taking up valuable space, creating ongoing liability, and adding to our already bloated environmental burden. And yet, 2025 presents a different path. A smarter one. One that replaces disposal with repurposing, and turns a dangerous waste product into a useful, circular resource. The technology exists. So the question we should be asking isn’t “Can we recycle asbestos?” It’s “Why the hell aren’t we doing it already?” Landfill is Failing Us—But We’re Still Relying On It Let’s start with the basics. There are still over 1.5 million buildings in the UK that contain asbestos, most of them now approaching the end of their useful life. As these structures age or undergo refurbishment, the volume of asbestos waste is only going to increase. Right now, we handle that waste the same way we did decades ago: • Identify it • Remove it (usually under fully controlled conditions) • Seal it in heavy-duty plastic • Drive it to landfill • Bury it • Forget about it Except we don’t forget, do we? Because landfill space is running out. Disposal costs are going up. And the environmental cost? We’re only just starting to count it. There’s a Better Way—and It Already Works Here’s what most duty holders don’t realise: We no longer have to bury asbestos. Thanks to recent advances in thermal treatment technology, we now have a method that can safely denature asbestos, breaking down its fibrous structure and rendering it harmless. Companies like Thermal Recycling in the UK are already proving this is not science fiction. They’re using high temperatures to transform asbestos cement products—like corrugated roofing sheets—into an inert ceramic material that’s completely safe. But here's the best bit: That material isn’t just neutral. It’s useful. It can be crushed and graded into aggregate, which can be used in road construction, paving, and concrete mixes. Instead of creating a waste burden for the next generation, we’re creating a valuable, low-carbon building material. Why Aggregate Matters in the Carbon Equation The production of virgin aggregates—through mining and quarrying—is energy-intensive and environmentally damaging. It contributes significantly to CO₂ emissions and destroys natural landscapes. So by replacing some of that demand with recycled aggregate from denatured asbestos, we: • Cut carbon emissions • Reduce dependence on extraction • Shrink the environmental footprint of infrastructure projects • Extend the life of quarries and reduce waste tonnage That’s not just a win for waste management. That’s a win for the entire construction supply chain. And yet most people in the industry don’t even know it’s possible. Why Are We Still Burying What Could Be Reused? As someone who’s worked in asbestos compliance for over 20 years—and now helps business leaders manage risk more intelligently—I’ve seen the same patterns play out time and time again: • “We’ll just do what we’ve always done.” • “This project’s tight on budget—landfill’s cheaper, right?” • “We’re just following the usual route—it’s less risky.” Let’s be honest. That mindset is outdated, short-sighted, and lazy. Cost may always be a factor, but the belief that landfill is “cheaper” needs to be challenged. Once you factor in: • Long-term environmental costs • Reputational risk • Rising disposal fees • And the public pressure for sustainable practices Thermal recycling is already starting to make sense. Especially when the output is something usable, not something buried. Licensed Contractors: You Don’t Get a Free Pass Either This isn’t just about clients or duty holders. Licensed Asbestos Removal Contractors (LARC’s) have a moral obligation here too. And I say that not from a place of opinion—but from first-hand experience, day in and day out for over two decades. Too often, LARCs put profits over progress. They default to landfill because it’s faster, easier to price up, and keeps their margins clean. They know the alternatives exist—but they don’t explore them, let alone offer them to their clients. When you hold a licence from the HSE, you’re not just a business—you’re a guardian of public health. That comes with responsibility. Choosing the most sustainable, forward-thinking disposal route should be part of that. Especially when the technology is available, proven, and legal. It’s time for the industry to stop hiding behind what’s convenient and start leading from the front. A Moral Obligation for Everyone Involved Whether you’re a: • Local authority managing public buildings • Developer under pressure to go green • Commercial landlord looking to reduce liability • Or a licensed contractor with influence over disposal routes —you have a responsibility to look beyond the cheapest or fastest option. If there’s a proven, safe, and more sustainable way to manage asbestos, you have a duty to understand it before choosing to ignore it. Because let’s be honest: “We didn’t know” isn’t going to wash when the public starts asking why we’re still filling landfill sites with a problem we already have the technology to eliminate. So What Can You Do Differently? No one’s asking you to overhaul your entire waste strategy overnight. But you can—and should—start asking better questions: • “Is landfill our only option here?” • “Could this waste stream be recycled instead of buried?” • “What suppliers, contractors, or experts do we know who can help us explore this?” You don’t have to be a global pioneer. But if you’re in a position of responsibility, you should at least be aware that the old way isn’t the only way anymore. Final Thought: The Future Is Circular—Whether You Join In or Not Asbestos will be with us for decades to come. That’s a fact. But how we handle it—and whether we choose to keep repeating the past or do something smarter—is up to us. Thermal recycling and other denaturing technologies offer a rare opportunity to do something that actually moves the industry forward. Not just ticking the compliance box. Not just burying the problem. But solving it—and turning it into something useful in the process. If you’re involved in asbestos management in even the slightest way, ask yourself this: Are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
by Adam Fox 13 January 2025
Compliance is no longer just about avoiding fines; it’s about creating workplaces where people can thrive.
by Adam Fox 6 December 2024
This is more than a regulatory issue—it’s a moral obligation
by Adam Fox 7 November 2024
Elevating health and safety from a compliance obligation to a strategic business focus offers immense benefits
by Adam Fox 4 September 2024
A groundbreaking solution to a long-standing problem
by Adam Fox 21 August 2024
More companies, sole traders and responsible individuals are now facing hefty fines or even custodial sentences for non-compliance
Show More