Shedding Light on the Dark Side: The UK Asbestos Industry's Independence Dilemma

Adam Fox • 3 October 2023

Achieving true independence in the asbestos industry is a complex and challenging task

Introduction to the UK asbestos industry


Asbestos, a mineral known for its heat resistance and durability, was once widely used in the construction industry in the United Kingdom. However, as its harmful health effects became apparent, the use of asbestos was banned in the UK in 1999. Despite this ban, the legacy of asbestos still lingers, posing significant health risks to those exposed to its fibres. In order to fully understand the current state of the UK asbestos industry, it is important to delve into the concept of independence within the industry.


The concept of independence in the industry


Independence, as it relates to the UK asbestos industry, refers to the ability of individuals and organisations within the industry to make impartial decisions, free from any external influence or conflict of interest. However, the reality is that achieving true independence in the asbestos industry is a complex and challenging task.


The conflict-of-interest dilemma


The conflict-of-interest dilemma arises when the interests of different stakeholders within the asbestos industry clash. For example, a company involved in asbestos removal may also have a financial interest in downplaying the health risks associated with asbestos exposure. This conflict of interest creates a significant obstacle to achieving independence within the industry.


Some asbestos surveying companies openly offer removal as well. This transparent approach can be advantageous for the client. However, it may also lead to survey rigging, suggesting a higher presence of asbestos on site than what is factual. This could also influence the advice provided by the company regarding the risk posed by the identified materials.

 

Deeper conflicts exist. Certain 'Accredited independent consultancies' covertly own asbestos removal companies. They might present a facade of impartiality by offering their removal management service to the client, putting the work out to tender to ensure a fair process. The client might see a higher cost, not knowing that the work eventually goes to the consultancy's own removal company under a different name. This hidden affiliation can lead to the client incurring substantially higher costs than necessary, not to mention the increased likelihood of sub-standard asbestos removal work being passed off as satisfactory in order to maintain their profit margins. This is all done right under the noses of accrediting bodies, the very bodies that are supposed to be driving the standards in the industry up and pushing the corruption out, yet they still fail to identify these hidden links between companies.

     

Price fixing and its impact on the industry


Price fixing, the illegal practice of colluding with competitors to set prices, has also played a significant role in compromising the independence of the UK asbestos industry. By artificially inflating prices, companies involved in price fixing can exploit the demand for asbestos-related products and services, further jeopardizing the safety of workers and the general public.


Uncovering price fixing and unethical practices


The discovery of price fixing and other unethical practices within the asbestos and demolition industries has been a pivotal moment in the fight for independence and transparency. Through investigations by regulatory bodies, such as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), and the exposure of internal company documents, the extent of these illegal practices has been revealed.


The CMA's recent investigation uncovered shocking details about the demolition industry's unscrupulous practices (which includes asbestos removal contracts). Ten UK-based firms were fined a staggering £59,334,957 for colluding on prices via illegal cartel agreements. Their rigged bids deceived customers into believing they were competitive, when they were not. Various firms were involved in instances of bid rigging between 2013 and 2018. The fines and the details surrounding this case highlight the insidious nature of these illegal activities, emphasising the need for vigilance and transparency in all industries, not just the asbestos sector.


This revelation has not only led to legal action against those involved but has also sparked a broader conversation about the need for stronger regulation and oversight within the industry.


The consequences of the independence dilemma


The lack of independence within the UK asbestos industry has had far-reaching consequences. The most significant of these is the continued exposure of individuals to asbestos fibres, leading to serious health conditions such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Additionally, the lack of independence has eroded trust in the industry, making it difficult for legitimate businesses to operate and for consumers to make informed decisions.


The role of government and regulatory bodies


Government intervention and the role of regulatory bodies are crucial in addressing the independence dilemma within the UK asbestos industry. It is the responsibility of these entities to enforce regulations, conduct thorough inspections, and hold companies accountable for their actions. By ensuring that strict standards are in place and that non-compliance is met with severe penalties, the government can play a vital role in promoting independence and protecting public health.


It is clear that currently, inspections are not thorough enough, so whilst any accreditations awarded by these bodies are only an indication that certain standards are being met, it is still vital that the customer carries out their own due diligence to ensure they are being looked after ethically on all fronts.


Case studies highlighting the independence dilemma


Several case studies illustrate the challenges posed by the lack of independence in the UK asbestos industry. Aside from those already mentioned above there is another example, where a company were involved in the manufacture and distribution of asbestos-containing products while simultaneously downplaying the health risks to its workers. This also showcases the conflict of interest dilemma. These case studies serve as a reminder of the urgent need for change within the industry.


Steps towards a more transparent asbestos industry


In order to address the independence dilemma within the UK asbestos industry, several steps need to be taken. Firstly, there must be increased transparency and accountability across the board. This can be achieved through the establishment of a centralised database of asbestos-related information, mandatory reporting of asbestos-related incidents, and regular audits of asbestos removal and disposal practices.


Raising awareness and advocacy for change


Raising awareness about the independence dilemma within the UK asbestos industry is crucial to driving change. Through education campaigns, public forums, and media coverage, the general public can be made aware of the hidden dangers and unethical practices associated with asbestos. Additionally, advocacy groups can play a key role in lobbying for stronger regulations and supporting affected individuals.


Promoting transparency and accountability in the UK asbestos industry


Promoting transparency and accountability within the UK asbestos industry requires a multi-faceted approach. Companies involved in asbestos-related activities should be required to disclose any conflicts of interest and actively work towards eliminating them. Regulatory bodies must conduct regular audits and inspections to ensure compliance with regulations and take swift action against those found to be in violation. These audits need to go deeper than they currently do to ensure no information can be withheld.


By fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, the industry can move towards a safer and more ethical future.


Steps individuals and organizations can take to protect themselves


While the responsibility for addressing the independence dilemma lies largely with the government and regulatory bodies, individuals and organisations can also take steps to protect themselves. This includes looking beyond accreditation and conducting your own thorough research before engaging with any asbestos-related services, ensuring that companies have a solid track record, and seeking legal advice in cases of suspected negligence or exposure.


Conclusion: Moving towards a safer and more ethical asbestos industry


The UK asbestos industry's independence dilemma is a complex issue that requires a collective effort to address. By acknowledging the conflict-of-interest dilemma, uncovering hidden secrets, and taking steps towards transparency and accountability, the industry can move towards a safer and more ethical future. It is only through the combined efforts of government, regulatory bodies, individuals, and organisations that the dark side of the UK asbestos industry can be fully exposed and eradicated.

Need Some Expert Advice?


Whatever your asbestos or compliance challenge, we're here to help with straightforward, practical advice. No unnecessary complications, just sensible solutions.

Button: Get in Touch
Asbestos survey when selling a house
by Adam Fox • 10 November 2026
Could suspected asbestos cause a buyer to pull out? Discover how an asbestos survey can protect a house sale and why refurbishment surveys matter.
A man with a torch and a child wearing a hard hat with a clipboard and pen
by Adam Fox • 10 March 2026
If you’re researching asbestos surveyors, there’s a good chance you’ve stumbled across the term UKAS accredited and wondered whether it’s a legal requirement, a quality stamp, or just another box-ticking exercise. Spoiler alert: it’s not that simple. In this article, we’re cutting through the confusion and giving you the no-fluff, fact-based truth about UKAS vs Non-UKAS asbestos surveyors —what the difference actually means, why we chose to remain non-UKAS accredited, and how that decision benefits our clients. Whether you’re a property manager, contractor, facilities professional, or just someone trying to stay compliant—you’re in the right place. What Is UKAS and Why Do Some Surveyors Get Accredited? UKAS stands for the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. It’s the UK’s only government-recognised body for accrediting organisations against internationally agreed standards, including ISO 17020 (inspection bodies) and ISO 17025 (testing laboratories). When it comes to asbestos surveying , UKAS can accredit companies to ISO 17020 standards for inspection bodies. In simple terms, that means the company has been assessed to ensure it follows consistent internal processes when delivering surveys. Here’s the key thing: There is NO legal requirement for asbestos surveyors to be UKAS accredited. None. The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 require employers to appoint a competent person or organisation—but competence doesn’t automatically mean accreditation . Yet many asbestos companies still throw around the UKAS badge to create the impression that only accredited firms are “good enough.” That's simply not true—and it's why you need to dig a little deeper. Why We Chose Not to Become UKAS Accredited We didn’t stumble into being non-UKAS by accident. It was a deliberate choice—and here’s why: 1. Experience Over Paperwork UKAS focuses on whether your process is consistent. It doesn’t test whether the individual surveyor on your site has 10 years’ experience—or 10 weeks. We believe deep technical knowledge is far more valuable than a certificate on a wall. 2. Flexibility to Do What’s Right UKAS-accredited firms are often boxed into rigid procedures that aren’t always the best or most pragmatic approach for every client. We work in the real world, not the theoretical world of audits. 3. Lower Costs Passed Back to Clients Maintaining UKAS accreditation is expensive—consultants, audits, extra paperwork. Those costs are baked into the fees you pay. We’d rather focus on delivering exceptional service and passing savings back to our clients wherever we can. 4. We Influence the Industry Directly Our directors sit on technical committees for two of the three major asbestos trade bodies. We’re literally shaping future best practice alongside the HSE and the industry's most respected voices. Our standards don’t come from fear of failing audits—they come from leading the industry forward . Is It Ever Better to Use a UKAS Accredited Surveyor? In some very specific situations, yes: Government/Public Sector Contracts Some public sector tender processes still specify that a UKAS-accredited surveyor must be used. Client Policy Requirements A handful of private clients (especially big corporates) insist on UKAS accreditation for internal policy reasons. Laboratory Testing and Air Monitoring Separate issue—but if you’re commissioning bulk sampling analysis or air monitoring, those must be UKAS accredited activities under UK law. For general asbestos surveys—especially for commercial refurbishments, domestic property works, facilities management, and ongoing compliance there is absolutely no need to insist on a UKAS accredited surveyor if you have a competent, experienced team. The Danger of Blindly Chasing Accreditation Here’s something most asbestos consultants won’t tell you: Accreditation doesn’t guarantee experience. It guarantees processes were followed. It guarantees the paperwork lines up. But the surveyor who shows up to inspect your £30m commercial site could just as easily be on their second month in the industry—following a checklist they barely understand. We’ve seen it happen. Too many times. Clients who think they’re "safe" because they ticked the UKAS box can still end up with surveys that are: Incomplete Misleading Not fit for purpose Causing huge project delays and unnecessary removal costs later And that’s the whole point: Choosing the right asbestos surveyor is about trust, not logos or badges. Why Clients Choose Consulo Compliance Instead We’re proudly non-UKAS because we put competence before compliance checklists . With Consulo Compliance, you get: Senior-level surveyors every time – no trainees running your site survey. Pragmatic advice – we weigh risk, cost, and compliance to give you sensible, practical guidance. Genuine client-first culture – our employees care because they’re looked after properly, not micromanaged to death. Independent support – no upselling you removal works you don't need. Huge network of trusted contractors – if removal or remediation is needed, we help you get it done right (often at rates cheaper than going direct). And ultimately, you get peace of mind —because you know the team supporting you is made up of real experts who genuinely have your best interests at heart. Conclusion: Accreditation Is a Tool, Not a Guarantee UKAS accreditation isn’t bad. It’s just not the magic bullet many people assume it is. When you're selecting an asbestos surveyor, the real questions you should be asking are: Who will actually be doing the work? What experience do they have? Can they give me pragmatic, real-world advice instead of just ticking boxes? Will they help me manage my asbestos safely without costing me a fortune unnecessarily? If the answer to those questions matters to you, you’re already thinking the way we do. And if you want a team that will give you straight answers, world-class service, and proper backup if you ever need it Consulo Compliance is ready when you are.
by Adam Fox • 9 April 2025
Asbestos and the Circular Economy: Why It's Time to Stop Burying the Problem Twenty-five years after asbestos was banned in the UK, we’re still digging a hole—literally and metaphorically. Every day, across the country, asbestos waste is double-bagged, labelled, loaded into skips, and driven to landfill, where it will sit indefinitely, taking up valuable space, creating ongoing liability, and adding to our already bloated environmental burden. And yet, 2025 presents a different path. A smarter one. One that replaces disposal with repurposing, and turns a dangerous waste product into a useful, circular resource. The technology exists. So the question we should be asking isn’t “Can we recycle asbestos?” It’s “Why the hell aren’t we doing it already?” Landfill is Failing Us—But We’re Still Relying On It Let’s start with the basics. There are still over 1.5 million buildings in the UK that contain asbestos, most of them now approaching the end of their useful life. As these structures age or undergo refurbishment, the volume of asbestos waste is only going to increase. Right now, we handle that waste the same way we did decades ago: • Identify it • Remove it (usually under fully controlled conditions) • Seal it in heavy-duty plastic • Drive it to landfill • Bury it • Forget about it Except we don’t forget, do we? Because landfill space is running out. Disposal costs are going up. And the environmental cost? We’re only just starting to count it. There’s a Better Way—and It Already Works Here’s what most duty holders don’t realise: We no longer have to bury asbestos. Thanks to recent advances in thermal treatment technology, we now have a method that can safely denature asbestos, breaking down its fibrous structure and rendering it harmless. Companies like Thermal Recycling in the UK are already proving this is not science fiction. They’re using high temperatures to transform asbestos cement products—like corrugated roofing sheets—into an inert ceramic material that’s completely safe. But here's the best bit: That material isn’t just neutral. It’s useful. It can be crushed and graded into aggregate, which can be used in road construction, paving, and concrete mixes. Instead of creating a waste burden for the next generation, we’re creating a valuable, low-carbon building material. Why Aggregate Matters in the Carbon Equation The production of virgin aggregates—through mining and quarrying—is energy-intensive and environmentally damaging. It contributes significantly to CO₂ emissions and destroys natural landscapes. So by replacing some of that demand with recycled aggregate from denatured asbestos, we: • Cut carbon emissions • Reduce dependence on extraction • Shrink the environmental footprint of infrastructure projects • Extend the life of quarries and reduce waste tonnage That’s not just a win for waste management. That’s a win for the entire construction supply chain. And yet most people in the industry don’t even know it’s possible. Why Are We Still Burying What Could Be Reused? As someone who’s worked in asbestos compliance for over 20 years—and now helps business leaders manage risk more intelligently—I’ve seen the same patterns play out time and time again: • “We’ll just do what we’ve always done.” • “This project’s tight on budget—landfill’s cheaper, right?” • “We’re just following the usual route—it’s less risky.” Let’s be honest. That mindset is outdated, short-sighted, and lazy. Cost may always be a factor, but the belief that landfill is “cheaper” needs to be challenged. Once you factor in: • Long-term environmental costs • Reputational risk • Rising disposal fees • And the public pressure for sustainable practices Thermal recycling is already starting to make sense. Especially when the output is something usable, not something buried. Licensed Contractors: You Don’t Get a Free Pass Either This isn’t just about clients or duty holders. Licensed Asbestos Removal Contractors (LARC’s) have a moral obligation here too. And I say that not from a place of opinion—but from first-hand experience, day in and day out for over two decades. Too often, LARCs put profits over progress. They default to landfill because it’s faster, easier to price up, and keeps their margins clean. They know the alternatives exist—but they don’t explore them, let alone offer them to their clients. When you hold a licence from the HSE, you’re not just a business—you’re a guardian of public health. That comes with responsibility. Choosing the most sustainable, forward-thinking disposal route should be part of that. Especially when the technology is available, proven, and legal. It’s time for the industry to stop hiding behind what’s convenient and start leading from the front. A Moral Obligation for Everyone Involved Whether you’re a: • Local authority managing public buildings • Developer under pressure to go green • Commercial landlord looking to reduce liability • Or a licensed contractor with influence over disposal routes —you have a responsibility to look beyond the cheapest or fastest option. If there’s a proven, safe, and more sustainable way to manage asbestos, you have a duty to understand it before choosing to ignore it. Because let’s be honest: “We didn’t know” isn’t going to wash when the public starts asking why we’re still filling landfill sites with a problem we already have the technology to eliminate. So What Can You Do Differently? No one’s asking you to overhaul your entire waste strategy overnight. But you can—and should—start asking better questions: • “Is landfill our only option here?” • “Could this waste stream be recycled instead of buried?” • “What suppliers, contractors, or experts do we know who can help us explore this?” You don’t have to be a global pioneer. But if you’re in a position of responsibility, you should at least be aware that the old way isn’t the only way anymore. Final Thought: The Future Is Circular—Whether You Join In or Not Asbestos will be with us for decades to come. That’s a fact. But how we handle it—and whether we choose to keep repeating the past or do something smarter—is up to us. Thermal recycling and other denaturing technologies offer a rare opportunity to do something that actually moves the industry forward. Not just ticking the compliance box. Not just burying the problem. But solving it—and turning it into something useful in the process. If you’re involved in asbestos management in even the slightest way, ask yourself this: Are you part of the problem, or part of the solution?
by Adam Fox • 13 January 2025
Compliance is no longer just about avoiding fines; it’s about creating workplaces where people can thrive.
by Adam Fox • 6 December 2024
This is more than a regulatory issue—it’s a moral obligation
by Adam Fox • 7 November 2024
Elevating health and safety from a compliance obligation to a strategic business focus offers immense benefits
Show More